Check out this sample research paper in support of gay marriage for information on this legally complex and important issue. Francis Bellamy certainly could not have possibly imagined the profound weight of the words he penned many years ago. Across the country, citizens of the United States pledge this verse with their hands over their hearts, facing the flag of the nation that represents and upholds these ideals. Yet discriminatory liberties and unequal freedoms are plentiful, often running amok throughout the United States.
From the African-Americans to gays, minorities have struggled to find their voice and their rights in America; however, these groups have still found a way to progressively alter public conceptualization of their place in society.
What is the question of same-sex marriage if not a direct request to have these uniquely American values defended? Allowing gays to marry is a critical step this country needs to take in order to progress culturally, economically, and globally as leaders in a more tolerant and peaceful world. The most fundamental issue when addressing same-sex marriage is the definition of marriage itself.
A universally accepted definition has yet to be established because marriage is a delicate entanglement of personal intimacy and public declaration. Above all, we as a society tend to value our freedom to choose the one we marry based on romance and compatibility—an instinctual desire to love and be loved.
We have largely developed the concept of marriage to include a formal union that joins a man and a woman who desire to be considered one entity under the law Poulter.
This definition is precise and reflects the perception put forth by Adam and Eve in the book of Genesis in the Old Testament. Therefore, much of the opposition to same-sex marriage is rooted in the Bible and its ethical code. James Dobson, an anti-gay marriage advocate and evangelical Christian psychologist and author, frequently references the Bible as the foundation for his argument.
This reflects his biggest concern about the legalization of same-sex marriage: The moral implications of same-sex marriage are ethically perverse and would only pave the way for additional sexual promiscuity Dobson.
What they fail to distinguish, however, is the fundamental difference between Canon and Common law. The United States has always differentiated between church and state ; therefore, the Constitution and the Bible are not, in this country, lawfully equivalent. Because of our first amendment rights to freedom of religion, not everyone has to believe in God and thereby abide by His rules. An additional—and powerful—source of same-sex marriage support comes from the somewhat surprising field of business.
As Supreme Court oral arguments commence, many businesses have begun to voice their advocacy. Because some states have legalized the unions of homosexual couples, the payroll systems and different tax treatments become a legal headache for employers. Section three of the Defense of Marriage Act DOMA restricts gay couples from over one thousand federal benefits, including the right to file a joint tax return. And according to noted NPR commentator and proponent of gay rights Jonathon Rauch, it would have human asset significance as well: It is a known sociological and anthropological fact that societies are fluid and dynamic.
Cultural shifts are inevitable—social norms evolve and conform accordingly. Our founding fathers recognized this and planned appropriately by constructing the framework of our government to aptly deal with changes in societal norms and ideologies. History tells us change is like eating your vegetables—met first by resistance and then swallowed with time.
I believe that this is why the issue of same-sex marriage is not only significant in terms of tolerance and civil liberties, but also for future sociocultural questions that deal with the changing mentality regarding relationships and love. Traditional values do not need to be compromised, only progressively reinforced and altered if necessary. For that reason alone, gay Americans should have the constitutional ability to marry.
The supreme court ruled in June of that denying same-sex marriage is unconstitutional. This ruling established gay marriage as legal in all fifty states. However, the ruling did not stop states from trying to disobey the court order by denying marriage licenses. For example, a local county marriage clerk from Kansas, Kim Davis, was caught on video denying a marriage license to a same-sex couple.
Finally, there is the perspective that gays should be allowed to marry because there is no such thing as a traditional marriage anymore; it is a new time and one group denying the rights of others just seems wrong. Marriage by definition is a union between a man and a woman, and it should stay that way in order to keep the value of the institution high and provide the right type of environment for children. Traditionally, the purpose of marriage is to procreate.
Same sex couples obviously cannot do this naturally; therefore it is unnecessary for them to marry. October 15 th , Baker vs. Nelson court decision defined the institution of marriage as a bond between a man and a woman involving the rearing of children. Gay marriage weakens institution of marriage. Divorce rates are already high, and the tolerance of this behavior by allowing marriages would only further weaken the institution.
Allowing same sex marriage could lead to other tolerances when it comes to marriage that would also weaken it, such as polygamy, incest, and bestiality. Parents of the same sex should not raise children. Research shows children benefit significantly more when they have parents of the opposite sex, and preventing them from this would deprive them from an optimum upbringing.
Gay marriage is incompatible with the beliefs, sacred texts, and traditions of many religious groups. Many Christians cite Leviticus Other passages can also be cited to justify this position. Homosexuality is a sin. It goes against the beliefs of many groups and therefore the people of those groups should not be forced to tolerate the act through the allowance of marriage between same sex couples.
Gay Marriage is protected by the constitution. Equal Protection Clause of the 14 th Amendment. No state shall deny a person the equal protection of the laws.
Although many states have adopted civil unions, they are separate and unequal. Same-sex marriage should be legalized to create equality and eliminate the injustice involving same-sex couples. Lauren Altergott. Woolley. Research paper. Outline. I. Introduction. II. Thesis. a.
OutlineThesis statement: The debate over whether or not people in same sex relationships should be allowed to marry, or even enter into civil uni Scribd is the world's largest social reading and publishing site.5/5(1).
Gay marriage allows same-sex partners to have the same legal rights in hospital visits, inheritance and more, as their hetero counterparts. Example Claims Against Gay Marriage. Traditionally, marriage is between a man and a woman and this should not be changed. Marriage is meant to be for procreation. “Same-sex marriage permits couples of the same gender to enter legally-recognized marriages and provides them with the same legal rights as couples in heterosexual relationships” (Same-Sex Marriage). “Opponents of same-sex marriage argue that the institution of marriage should apply to only unions between one man and one woman.
Same-sex marriage (also called gay marriage) is a legally or socially recognized marriage between two persons of the same biological sex or social gender. Same-sex marriage is a civil rights, political, social, moral, and religious issue in many nations. Below is a free excerpt of "Gay Marriage Outline Paper" from Anti Essays, your source for free research papers, essays, and term paper examples/5(1).